Filing a summary judgment motion is a critical decision in civil litigation. For defendants, it can mean the difference between an early dismissal of the case and a prolonged, costly trial. This post will explore when a defendant should file a summary judgment motion, referencing the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) that govern these motions, specifically, Rule 56.

Understanding Summary Judgment

Summary judgment is a procedural mechanism used to avoid unnecessary trials. It is granted when there is no genuine dispute to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. In essence, it means that even if all the evidence were viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, the moving party would still win because there are no factual issues requiring a trial.

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: Rule 56

The governing rule for summary judgment in federal court is Rule 56 of the FRCP. Rule 56 states that a party may move for summary judgment, identifying each claim or defense or the part of each claim or part of each defense which summary judgment is sought. The motion must be supported by citing materials in the record, including depositions, documents, electronically stored information, affidavits or declarations.

Key points of Rule 56 include:

1. Timing: A party may file for summary judgment at any time until 30 days after the close of all discovery unless a different time is set by local rule or court order.
2. Notice and Opportunity to Respond: The non-moving party must be given notice and an opportunity to respond to the motion. They must demonstrate that there is a genuine issue for trial.
3. Supporting and Opposing Affidavits: Both sides can use affidavits to support or oppose the motion. These must be made on personal knowledge, set out facts that would be admissible in evidence, and show that the affiant is competent to testify on the matters stated.

When Should a Defendant File For Summary Judgment?

Filing for summary judgment is not a decision to be taken lightly. Here are some key considerations for when a defendant should file a summary judgment motion:

• After Sufficient Discovery: Summary judgment is appropriate after substantial discovery has taken place. Discovery is where both parties exchange information and gather evidence. By waiting until discovery is well underway or nearly complete, the defendant ensures that they have all the necessary evidence to support their motion.
• When There is No Genuine Issue of Material Fact: The defendant should file for summary judgment when it is clear that the plaintiff cannot provide sufficient evidence to support an essential element of their case. For example, if the plaintiff must prove negligence but has no evidence of the defendants duty or breach of duty, summary judgment may be appropriate.
• To Narrow the Issues for Trial: Even if a summary judgment motion does not dispose of the entire case, it can be used to narrow the issues. For instance, if there are multiple claims or defenses, summary judgment can eliminate those that lack factual support, streamlining the case for trial.
• Strategic Considerations: Defendants might also consider the strategic impact of filing for summary judgment. For example, a successful motion can apply pressure on the plaintiff to settle the remaining claims. Additionally, the defendants resources and the potential cost savings from avoiding a trial can influence the decision.
• Clear Legal Precedent: If there is a strong legal precedent supporting the defendants position, filing for summary judgment can be advantageous. Courts are likely to grant summary judgment if previous rulings in similar cases clearly favor the defendants arguments.

Example Scenarios

Here are some sample scenarios where a defendant may want to file a summary judgment motion

1. Contract Dispute: In a contract dispute where the plaintiff alleges breach of contract but fails to provide evidence of the contracts terms or the alleged breach, the defendant can move for summary judgment on the grounds that there is no genuine issue of material fact regarding the existence of the contract or the breach.
2. Employment Discrimination: In an employment discrimination case, if the defendant has evidence showing that the employment decision was based on legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons and the plaintiff cannot produce evidence to the contrary, summary judgment may be appropriate.
3. Product Liability: In a product liability case, if the plaintiff cannot demonstrate that the product was defective or that the defect caused their injury, the defendant can move for summary judgment.
4. Prisoner First Amendment Retaliation: In a prisoners First Amendment retaliation lawsuit, if the plaintiff cannot establish the retaliation was due to engaging in protected conduct, the defendant can move for summary judgment.

Practical Tips For Defendants Filing Summary Judgment Motions

Here are some practical tips for defendants intending to file a summary judgment motion:

1. Gather Strong Evidence: Ensure that all supporting documents, affidavits, and depositions are well organized and clearly demonstrate the absence of material facts.
2. Follow Procedural Rules: Adhere to the deadlines and procedural requirements outlined in Rule 56, local court rules, and court orders.
3. Be Thorough and Persuasive: The motion should be thorough, clearly presenting the legal and factual basis for summary judgment. Persuasive arguments that cite relevant case law and statutes are crucial.
4. Anticipate the Plaintiffs Response: Consider potential arguments the plaintiff might raise in opposition and address them preemptively in the motion.

My Final Thoughts

Filing a defendants summary judgment motion can be a powerful tool in civil litigation. By understanding the provisions of Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and carefully considering the timing and strategic implications, defendants can effectively use summary judgment to their advantage. Whether to narrow the issues for trial or potentially end the litigation early, a well-timed and well-supported summary judgment motion can be a decisive factor in the outcome of the case.

If you or an incarcerated friend or loved one is pursuing or wanting to file a Section 1983 civil rights lawsuit, consider purchasing our book, The Colossal Book of Civil Citations. This one book contains all the information necessary to successfully litigate a 42 U.S.C. §1983 lawsuit. Our books are softcover, institution friendly, and frequently advertised in Prison Legal News magazine. Order your copy today, or on behalf of someone incarcerated.