An Introduction to Extradition

Extradition is a legal process that involves one jurisdiction surrendering a suspect or defendant to another jurisdiction for the purpose of facing criminal charges. The process typically occurs between states within a country, but it can also apply internationally. It insures that individuals accused of crimes can’t simply cross borders to escape justice.

This blog post will explain how extradition works when someone is facing criminal charges, the steps involved, and how a defendant can fight or challenge the extradition process.

What Does Extradition Mean?

Extradition is the formal process by which one state, country, or territory requests the return of an individual who has been charged with or convicted of a crime. In the United States, for instance, it happens between both individual states and between the U.S. and foreign nations. The process is governed by treaties and laws that outline the conditions under which extradition is allowed, as well as the grounds for challenging it.

How are People Extradited?

The process begins with the discovery that an individual is wanted for a crime in another jurisdiction. This typically starts when the state or country seeking extradition submits a formal request. Here’s an overview of how that process works:

• Request for Extradition: When a person is wanted in another state for criminal charges, the authorities in the requesting state send a formal request to the state where the person is located. This request usually includes the individuals identity, a description of the charges, and evidence supporting the accusations. In the U.S., this is often done through a legal document called an extradition warrant or requisition.
• Review by the Receiving State: Once the receiving state (where the individual is located) receives the request, it will review the documents to determine if they meet the legal requirements for extradition. In the U.S., the receiving state will check if the crime is a valid extraditable offense under both state and federal law.
• Extradition Hearing: If the request is valid, an extradition hearing is held. This is where the defendant is informed of the request and the reasons for it. During the hearing, the defendant has an opportunity to contest the extradition. The court may also review whether the defendant meets certain criteria, such as whether they are a fugitive or if the charges are eligible for extradition under the law.
• Extradition Decision: If the court finds that it is warranted, the defendant may be handed over to the authorities from the requesting state. In some cases, a governor or other high-ranking official may need to approve the extradition before it begins.
• Transfer to the Requesting State: Once extradition is approved, the defendant is physically transported to the requesting jurisdiction to stand trial. This transfer is generally done by law enforcement personnel from the requesting jurisdiction.

Common Grounds for Extradition

For it to be allowed, the crime for which a defendant is being charged must meet certain criteria. In the U.S., this is often governed by the U.S. Constitution (Article IV), and state level extradition laws. Here are some common grounds that must be met for it to take place:

• Extraditable Offenses: The offense in question must be a crime that is recognized as extraditable. Common extraditable offenses like murder, robbery, and drug trafficking. However, minor offenses may not be subject to extradition.
• Dual Criminality: This principles require that the act for which a person is charged must be a crime in both the requesting and receiving states. For example, if someone is accused of a crime that is not illegal in the state where they are currently located, they may not be extradited for that offense.
• Specific Charges: Extradition typically applies only to the charges outlined in the request. If the defendant is facing other charges, those may not be eligible for extradition unless specifically mentioned in the request.
• Pending Legal Action: Extradition is typically only requested when formal criminal charges are already pending. If there is no indictment or arrest warrant, extradition may not be granted.
• Treaties and Agreements: Extradition is often governed by formal treaties between the states or countries involved. These treaties outline the specific terms under which a person can be extradited.

How to Beat Extradition

Although extradition is a legal process, it is not always automatic. A defendant facing extradition has several option for challenging the process. Here are some common defenses that a defendant might use to fight extradition:

1. Lack of Dual Criminality

As mentioned earlier, for extradition to occur, the alleged offense must be a crime in both the requesting and receiving states. If the crime the defendant is accused of is not a criminal act in the receiving state, they can challenge it on the basis of “dual criminality.”

For example, some states may not have laws against a certain type of drug possession or a specific form of white-collar crime. If the defendant can prove that the crime does not exist in the receiving state, the extradition request may be denied.

2. Political Offenses

Many extradition treaties and laws contain exemptions for political offenses. If the alleged crime is of political nature such as protesting or resisting government policies, the defendant may argue that it is not appropriate.

For example, someone who is accused of participating in an anti-government protest or who is charged with an act of dissent may claim that the charge is politically motivated. Extradition laws typically prohibit the transfer of individuals facing charges related to political activism or protest.

3. Risk of Death Penalty or Life Imprisonment

In cases where the requesting state seeks extradition for a crime that could result in the death penalty or a life sentence without parole, a defendant may argue that it should be blocked. Many countries, including the U.S., have treaties that prohibit extradition when the defendant faces the death penalty, unless assurances are made that such a sentence will not be imposed.

For example, a defendant who faces charges in a state where the death penalty is still legal may argue that they should not be extradited to avoid the risk of execution.

4. Extradition is Not Timely

Extradition requests typically need to be made within a reasonable time frame. If the defendant has been living in the receiving state for a long time and the request is delayed, they may challenge the request based on the principle of timeliness. A long delay may cause the defendant to argue that they are being unfairly subjected to the process after an unreasonable amount of time.

5. Fugitive Status

A defendant may also argue that they are not actually a fugitive. If someone is accused of committing a crime but has been living in the receiving state for years without being captured, they may argue that the requesting state has no legitimate claim on their extradition. A defendant might contend that they did not flee from justice or that they were unaware that they were even a suspect.

6. Inadequate Evidence

While evidence is typically reviewed in the extradition hearing, a defendant may challenge the request by arguing that the evidence presented by the requesting state is insufficient or faulty. For instance, if the evidence is based on hearsay or unreliable sources, the defendant may argue that the request should be denied due to the lack of credible proof.

My Final Thoughts

Extradition is an important legal tool used to ensure that individuals accused of crimes are held accountable for their actions, even if they flee across borders. The process involves careful scrutiny of legal requirements, such as whether the crime is extraditable and if there are valid reasons for challenging the request. A defendant facing extradition has several ways to challenge the process, from arguing that the crime is not extraditable to claiming political motives behind the charges.

It is important for individuals facing extradition to consult with a legal professional or conduct thorough research to navigate the process and mount a defense based on the facts of the case. It can be complex, but understanding the key concepts and how the process works can make a significant difference in the outcome of a case.

If you, or someone you know, will be going to trial or seeking relief after a criminal conviction, our book, The Colossal Book of Criminal Citations, is a crucial resource in the pursuit of justice. Our books are in stock and ready for immediate shipping. Order your copy today or on behalf of someone incarcerated. Our books are softcover, institution friendly, and frequently advertised in Prison Legal News.