Cybercrime, also known as computer crime, refers to illegal activities that are conducted using computers or the internet. As technology becomes increasingly integrated into everyday life, cybercrime has evolved into one of the most significant criminal threats globally. From hacking and identity theft to cyberstalking and online fraud, cybercrimes can range from small-scale operations to sophisticated attacks that effect entire nations.

This blog will delve into the nature of cybercrime, exploring various types of offenses, legal frameworks, and potential defenses that can be employed when someone is charged with a cybercrime.

What is Cybercrime?

Cybercrime encompasses a broad range of criminal activities conducted through the use of digital technology and the internet. Typically, cybercrimes involve the illegal accessing or manipulation of computer systems, data, or networks. These crimes often target sensitive information such as personal identification details, financial data, or proprietary business information.

Common Types of Cybercrimes

Some common types of cybercrime can include:

1. Hacking: Gaining unauthorized access to a computer system or network to steal, alter, or manipulate information.
2. Identity Theft: Stealing someone’s personal information, such as social security numbers, bank details, or passwords, to commit fraud or theft.
3. Phishing: Using fake emails, websites, or messages to deceive individuals into providing personal information or login credentials.
4. Malware Attacks: Distributing malicious software, including viruses, ransomware, or spyware, to disrupt or damage computer systems.
5. Cyberstalking: Using electronic communication to harass or stalk someone, often involving threats or intimidation.
6. Online Fraud: Scams conducted through the internet, such as e-commerce fraud, Ponzi schemes, or fraudulent investment scams.
7. DDoS Attacks (Distributed Denial of Service): Overloading a targeted network or website with traffic to make it unavailable to users.
8. Intellectual Property Theft: Unauthorized copying, distribution, or use of copyrighted materials, trademarks, or patents.

Legal Framework For Cybercrime

Cybercrime laws vary across jurisdictions, but most developed countries have established specific statutes to combat these offenses. In the United States, several laws are applicable to cybercrime, including:

Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA):

This law criminalizes unauthorized access to computers, as well as the transmission of malware, fraud, and damage to computer systems.

Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA)

This law protects the privacy of electronics communications and regulates the interception of such communications.

Identity Theft and Assumption Deterrence Act (ITADT)

Criminalizes identity theft and provides for enhanced penalties for those who commit this crime.

Children’s Online Privacy Protections Act (COPPA)

Designed to protect children’s personal information online by regulating websites that collect data from minors.

In addition to these federal laws, individual states may have their own cybercrime statutes, and international agreements like the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime have sought to standardize and strengthen global cooperation in prosecuting cybercrimes.

Defenses in Cybercrime Cases

Being accused of a cybercrime can be overwhelming, and defending against such charges requires a well-constructed legal strategy. The defenses available will depend on the specific crime alleged, but here are some common defenses used in cybercrime cases:

Lack of Intent (No Mens Rea)

One of the core elements of most criminal cases is “mens rea,” or the intention to commit a crime. In cybercrime cases, the prosecution must often prove that the defendant acted with criminal intent. If the defendant can demonstrate that they had no intention to commit a crime such as accessing a computer system accidentally or engaging in what they thought was lawful conduct, this may serve as a defense. For example, a cybersecurity professional may unintentionally access a sensitive part of a system while performing legitimate duties, and their actions could be misconstrued as malicious hacking.

Authorization or Consent

In some cases, the defendant may have had permission to access a computer system or network, negating the unauthorized access element of cybercrime. Consent can be explicit, such as a written or verbal approval, or implied, such as having the defendant’s actions accepted as part of their regular job duties. Demonstrating that the defendant was authorized to perform the contested actions could serve as a strong defense.

Insufficient Evidence

Cybercrime cases often rely heavily on digital evidence, which can be complex and challenging to trace definitively back to an individual. The prosecution must establish that the defendant was the person who committed the cybercrime. However, since computers and networks can be accessed remotely, it can be difficult to prove who was behind the crime. If the defense can cast doubt on the strength, integrity, or origin of the evidence, it may weaken the prosecution’s case.

Entrapment

Entrapment occurs when law enforcement officers induce someone to commit a crime that they would not have committed otherwise. In cybercrime cases, this might involve law enforcement creating an opportunity for the defendant to engage in illegal activities, such as downloading illegal material or participating in hacking activities. If the defendant can show that they were coerced or tricked into committing the offense, they may argue they were entrapped and thus not culpable for the crime.

Computer or Network Compromise

A defendant might argue that their computer or network was hacked, and they were not responsible for the alleged cybercrime. For instance, malware or unauthorized access to the defendant’s system could allow a third party to commit crimes under the defendant’s IP address. Demonstrating that the defendant’s system was compromised by external actors, like a botnet or virus, may absolve them of liability.

Mistaken Identity

The nature of cybercrime often makes it difficult to identify the true perpetrator. Hackers often hide behind anonymous IP addresses or use other peoples devices to execute cyberattacks, making it hard for investigators to pinpoint who is responsible. If there is any doubt about the defendant’s identity or whether they actually committed the crime, this could be used as a defense. The defense may challenge the forensic evidence linking the defendant to the crime, such as recovered files, metadata or login credentials.

Constitutional Violations

A defense may be based on constitutional protections, particularly in cases where the defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights were violated. If law enforcement obtained evidence through an illegal search or seizure, the defense may file a motion to suppress the evidence. For example, if investigators accessed the defendant’s computer without a proper warrant, any evidence collected may be inadmissible in court, which could lead to the case being dismissed or significantly weakened.

Duress

A defendant may argue they were forced to commit a cybercrime under duress. Duress involves situations where an individual is coerced into committing a crime due to threats of harm or other severe consequences. If the defendant can prove that they acted under duress, they may be able to avoid liability.

How to Respond to Cybercrime Charges

When facing charges related to cybercrime, its crucial to work with an experienced criminal defense attorney who specializes in cybercrime. These cases are often complex, requiring a deep understanding of both criminal law and technological issues. An attorney can help develop a strategic defense based on the facts of the case, the type of cybercrime alleged, and the applicable laws. Common steps in responding to cybercrime charges include:

1. Consult with an Attorney: An experienced lawyer will review the charges, investigate the evidence, and determine the best defense strategy.
2. Examine Digital Evidence: Carefully scrutinizing the digital evidence, such as IP addresses, server logs, and other technical details, can reveal potential weaknesses in the prosecution’s case.
3. File Pretrial Motions: Defense attorneys can file motions to challenge the evidence, suppress illegally obtained material, or dismiss the charges outright.
4. Prepare for Trial or Plea Negotiations: Depending on the case’s strength, an attorney may either recommend a trial to challenge the charges or negotiate a plea deal for reduced penalties.

My Final Thoughts

Cybercrime is a rapidly evolving area of criminal law that presents unique challenges for defendants and law enforcement alike. Defending against cybercrime charges requires a nuanced approach, taking into account both the technical details of the crime and the legal framework governing computer-related offenses. With the right legal representation and a strong defense strategy, individuals accused of a cybercrime may be able to overcome the charges and protect their rights.

If you, or someone you know, will be proceeding to trial, challenging an imposed sentence or pursuing any type of post-conviction relief, our book, The Colossal Book of Criminal Citations, is a crucial resource in the pursuit of justice. Our books are soft cover, institution friendly, in stock, and frequently advertised in Prison Legal News magazine. Order your copy today, or on behalf of someone incarcerated.