Clemency and pardons are terms that are often used interchangeably but they have distinct meanings and are granted under different circumstances. These legal tools can offer relief to individuals who have been convicted of crimes, allowing them to receive a reduction in their sentences, a full pardon, or other forms of leniency. In this post, we’ll explore what clemency and pardons are, who has the authority to grant them, and why the U.S. President cannot grant clemency or a pardon to someone convicted in a state court.

What is Clemency?

Clemency refers to the act of showing mercy or leniency to someone who has been convicted of a crime. It is a broad term that encompasses several forms of relief, including pardons, commutations, reprieves and remissions. Essentially, clemency allows for a reduction or removal of the legal consequences associated with a criminal conviction.

The power to grant clemency is typically seen as a way to correct possible injustices, offer second chances, or respond to extenuating circumstances. Clemency is typically granted when there is compelling evidence that a person’s punishment is excessive or unjust given new circumstances, such as good behavior, rehabilitation, or the emergence of new evidence that might suggest the original conviction was flawed.

What are the Different Types of Clemency?

There are several forms of clemency each serving a different purpose:

• Pardon: A pardon is an official forgiveness for a crime, effectively erasing the legal consequences of the conviction. A pardon does not expunge the criminal record but restores rights such as the right to vote, serve on a jury, or hold public office.
• Commutation: A commutation reduces the severity of a person’s sentence. For example, if someone was sentenced to life in prison, a commutation might shorten their sentence or change it to a fixed term, such as 20 years. A commutation does not overturn the conviction but alters the punishment.
• Reprieve: A reprieve temporarily delays the punishment, often in cases of death sentences. A reprieve is typically granted to allow time for further investigation or appeals. It can also be used to postpone a punishment due to extenuating circumstances, such as the health condition of the person awaiting punishment.
• Remission: This is a reduction in the amount of a sentence already served. It can be applied to fines, fees, or even time spent in jail. Remission is often used in cases where the punishment was overly harsh or when the individual has shown extraordinary behavior.

Who Can Grant Clemency or Pardons?

In the United States, clemency and pardons are typically granted by either the President (in the case of federal crimes) or the governor of a state (in the case of state crimes). The authority to grant clemency is enshrined in both the U.S. Constitution and state constitutions, but the scope of this power varies depending on whether the conviction is federal or state-level.

The U.S. President’s Power to Grant Clemency

Under the U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 2, the President has the authority to grant clemency, specifically the power to pardon individuals convicted of federal crimes. This power is nearly absolute, with the only restriction being that it cannot be used to pardon individuals who have been impeached by Congress. The President’s power to grant clemency does not extend to state-level convictions. The U.S. President can issue a pardon, commute sentences, or grant reprieves primarily to individuals convicted under federal law.

For example, if a person is convicted of a federal offense, such as tax evasion or drug trafficking, and has served part of their sentence, they may apply for clemency. If the President deems the case worthy of leniency, they may issue a pardon, reducing the individual’s sentence or even pardoning them entirely, restoring all rights and privileges they had lost due to their conviction.

State Governors and Clemency

While the President can grant clemency for federal offenses, governors have the authority to grant clemency for state-level offenses. Each state has its own process for handling clemency petitions, but governors typically have the power to issue pardons commutations, and reprieves for individuals convicted of crimes under state law. Governors often rely on state parole boards or clemency commissions to review applications for clemency and provide recommendations before making a decision.

In some states, the governor’s power to grant clemency is more limited. For example, in certain states, pardons and commutations require the approval of a board or commission in addition to the governor’s signature. In others, the governor can grant clemency unilaterally. The process varies from state to state, but generally, it involves a careful review of the individual’s case, the nature of the crime, their behavior since the conviction, and other factors that may warrant a reduction in their sentence or a full pardon.

Why Can’t the President Grant Clemency to State Prisoners?

The reason the U.S. President cannot grant clemency or a pardon to individuals convicted in a state court is due to the separation of federal and state legal systems. The U.S. Constitution divides powers between federal and state governments, and as such, the President’s authority to grant clemency is limited to federal offenses only.

In other words, when someone is convicted of a crime under state law, the President does not have jurisdiction over that case. The powers of the U.S. President are strictly tied to federal law, and since state law is administered by state governments, any clemency decisions regarding state convictions must come from state authorities, typically the governor or state clemency board.

Moreover, the states have their own legal systems and they are entitled to manage their own criminal justice processes , including issuing clemency and pardons. Allowing a federal authority like the President to interfere in state-level matters could lead to an imbalance in power and undermine the principles of federalism, which is a foundational aspect of the U.S. system of government

For example, if someone is convicted of a crime in a state such as California, that individual must apply for clemency to the Governor of California or a relevant state board. The U.S. President does not have the constitutional authority to grant relief in such cases.

What are the Limitations of Clemency and Pardons?

While clemency and pardons provide a valuable means of offering mercy or correcting injustices, they are not without limitations. Some of these limitations include:

• Limited to Specific Jurisdictions: As noted, the U.S. President can only grant clemency for federal convictions, and state governors have jurisdiction over state crimes.
• No Effect on Civil Rights: While a pardon restores certain civil rights, such as the right to vote or run for office, it does not automatically erase a person’s criminal record. In some cases, individuals may still face discrimination or obstacles because of their past convictions.
• Not Applicable to all Crimes: Some crimes, especially violent or heinous offenses, are less likely to be pardoned, especially if public opinion is against the pardon.
• Political Considerations: Clemency decisions are often influenced by political factors. A President or governor may grant clemency based on public pressure or political considerations, which may complicate the fairness of the process.

My Final Thoughts

Clemency and pardons are powerful tools within the criminal justice system, providing an avenue for individuals to seek mercy after being convicted of a crime. These measures serve as a safety net for those who may have been excessively punished or those who have demonstrated rehabilitation. While the President holds the power to grant clemency for federal offenses, they cannot intervene in state-level convictions, as each state governs its own legal process. The separation of powers between state and federal governments ensures that each jurisdiction operates independently, with its own mechanisms for handling clemency and pardons.

Ultimately, clemency is not about absolving individuals of their crimes, but rather about offering a chance of redemption, especially when new information or rehabilitation suggests that a person’s punishment may no longer be justified.

If you, or someone you know, will be proceeding to trial, challenging a criminal sentence, pursuing post-conviction relief, or litigating a Civil Rights Section 1983 lawsuit, our books are crucial resources in the pursuit of justice. Purchase your copy today, or on behalf of someone incarcerated who may have seen our advertisement in Prison Legal News magazine.