In cases involving allegations of sexual exploitation with computer images of child pornography, defendants face severe consequences and complex legal proceedings. Pretrial motions play a critical role in shaping the trajectory of the case and ensuring the protection of the defendant’s rights. In this comprehensive guide, I unveil my top five pretrial motions that should be filed in sex-based criminal cases, explaining their significance and reasoning.
The Importance of Pretrial Motions
Before revealing my top five pretrial motions for cases involving child pornography, let’s consider why pretrial motions in criminal cases are important. When an attorney fails to file an outcome-determinative motion which would have been successful, such as a motion to suppress evidence, then permits a defendant to plead guilty or go to trial, that attorney will likely be found ineffective. See: Lee v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 1958 (2017). Consequently, any motion which has a strong likelihood of being successful should be filed before the criminal trial or before permitting a defendant to plead guilty.
What Pretrial Motions Should be Filed in a Child Pornography Case?
While every case is unique, here is my list of the top five motions which should be filed in a case involving child pornography:
#1 Motion to Suppress Evidence in a Child Pornography Case
One of the most common motions in criminal cases involves challenging the legality of the search and seizure that led to the discovery of the incriminating evidence. In child pornography cases, law enforcement often conducts searches of electronic devices, such as computers and smart phones. A motion to suppress evidence alleges that the search was conducted without a valid warrant, or that the warrant was based on insufficient probable cause. If successful, this motion can result in the exclusion of key evidence, significantly weakening the prosecution’s case.
#2 Motion to Dismiss for Insufficient Evidence in a Child Pornography Case
A motion to dismiss for insufficient evidence challenges the prosecution’s ability to meet its burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. In child pornography cases, prosecutors must demonstrate that the defendant knowingly possessed or distributed illicit images of minors. This motion argues that the evidence presented by the prosecution is insufficient to support a conviction. It also addresses issues such as mistaken identity or lack of intent, depending on the specifics of the case.
#3 Motion for Discovery of Exculpatory Evidence in a Child Pornography Case
Defendants have a constitutional right to access evidence that is favorable to their case and could potentially exonerate them. This includes evidence that may undermine the credibility of witnesses or cast doubt on the prosecution’s theory of the case. In child pornography cases, exculpatory evidence may include forensic analysis of electronic devices, witness statements, or communication records that support the defendant’s innocence. A motion for discovery seeks to compel the prosecution to disclose all relevant evidence, ensuring a fair trial.
#4 Motion to Suppress Statements or Confessions in a Child Pornography Case
In many cases, law enforcement officers obtain statements or confessions from defendants during the course of an investigation. A motion to suppress statements or confessions challenges the admissibility of these statements, arguing that they were obtained in violation of the defendant’s constitutional rights. This may include instances of coercion, Miranda violations, or other forms of police misconduct. Suppressing incriminating statements can significantly weaken the prosecution’s case and limit the evidence available for trial.
Motion to Sever Charges in a Child Pornography Case
In cases involving multiple defendants or multiple charges, a motion to sever seeks to separate the charges or defendants into separate trials. This motion is often filed when one defendant’s actions could prejudice the jury against the other defendant, or when the charges are unrelated and would result in confusion or unfair prejudice if tried together. In child pornography cases, severance may be sought if co-defendants have conflicting defenses or if evidence against one defendant could unfairly taint the perception of another. Severing charges or defendants can lead to more focused and fair proceedings.
My Final Thoughts
In conclusion, defendants facing allegations of sexual exploitation involving computer images of child pornography must navigate a complex legal landscape. Pretrial motions offer crucial opportunities to challenge the prosecution’s case, protect the defendant’s rights, and secure a fair trial. By strategically filing motions to suppress, dismiss charges, obtain exculpatory evidence, suppress statements and sever charges or defendants, defendants can work towards a favorable outcome in their case. If the case cannot be resolved through pretrial motions and will proceed to a trial, be sure to review my Top 25 Juror Questions For a Child Porn Case before selecting a jury.
This blog post serves as a guide for defendants and their legal counsel to understand the significance and reasoning behind these top five pretrial motions in child pornography cases. By leveraging these motions effectively, defendants can assert their rights and defend against the serious allegations they face.
If you, or someone you know, will be proceeding to trial, challenging an imposed sentence or pursuing any type of post-conviction relief, our book, The Colossal Book of Criminal Citations, is a crucial resource in the pursuit of justice. Our books are softcover, institution friendly and ready for immediate shipping. Order your copy today, or on behalf of someone incarcerated.