Prosecutorial discretion is a critical aspect of the criminal justice system, granting prosecutors the authority to decide whether or not to bring criminal charges against an individual. This power is vast and carries significant implications for the accused, victims, and the broader community. In this blog post, we’ll explore what prosecutorial discretion is, the factors influencing these decisions, and the relevant court cases that illustrate how this discretion has been exercised and challenged.

What is Prosecutorial Discretion?

Prosecutorial discretion refers to the prosecutors ability to decide whether to pursue criminal charges, which charges to file, and how to pursue a case. This discretion is rooted in the principle that law enforcement and judicial resources are limited, and it allows prosecutors to allocate these resources in a manner that serves the interest of justice.

Factors Influencing Prosecutorial Discretion

Several factors can influence a prosecutors decision to file charges, including:

1. Strength of the Evidence: Prosecutors must assess whether there is sufficient evidence to support a conviction. This includes evaluating the credibility of witnesses, the availability of physical evidence, and the overall likelihood of securing a guilty verdict.
2. Seriousness of the Offense: The nature and severity of the alleged crime plays a significant role. Violent crimes and offenses that pose a substantial threat to public safety are more likely to be prosecuted.
3. Criminal History: A defendants prior criminal record can impact the decision. Repeat offenders or those with a history of similar offenses are more likely to face charges.
4. Victims Wishes: While not determinative, the desires of the victim can influence the prosecutors decision, especially in cases of minor offenses, or where the victim may prefer alternative resolutions.
5. Resource Considerations: Prosecutors must consider the availability of office resources, including time, personnel, and financial constraints. They do not need to consider public defender/defense resources. High-profile cases or those requiring extensive investigation may be prioritized.
6. Public Interest: The broader impact on the community and public confidence in the justice system can also guide prosecutorial decisions. Cases that attract significant public attention or that address widespread issues may be given precedence.

Supreme Court Precedent Supports Prosecutorial Discretion

Broad prosecutorial discretion has been upheld through various Supreme Court decisions including:

United State v. Armstrong

In United States v. Armstrong, 116 S.Ct. 1480 (1996), the Supreme Court addressed the issue of selective prosecution, which occurs when a prosecutor decides to charge a defendant based on discriminatory reasons such as race, religion, or other protected characteristics. The Court held that to challenge a decision on these grounds, defendants must show clear evidence that similarly situated individuals of a different race were not prosecuted. This case underscores the difficulty of proving prosecutorial misconduct and reinforces the broad discretion afforded to prosecutors.

Wayte v. United States

In Wayte v. United States, 105 S.Ct. 1524 (1985), the Supreme Court examined the discretion of prosecutors in the context of selective prosecutions. The defendant argued that he was prosecuted for refusing to register for the draft because he was vocal about his opposition. The Court ruled that the prosecution did not violate the First Amendment because the government had a legitimate interest in ensuring compliance with the draft law. This case highlights the balance between prosecutorial discretion and constitutional protections.

Bordenkircher v. Hayes

In Bordenkircher v. Hayes, 98 S.Ct. 663 (1978), the Supreme Court considered the prosecutors discretion in plea bargaining. The defendant was offered a plea deal but refused, and the prosecutor then pursued more severe charges. The Court upheld this practice, stating as long as the defendant is free to accept or reject the offer, the prosecutors conduct does not violate due process. This case demonstrates the prosecutorial leverage in negotiating pleas and the strategic use of discretion.

United States v. LaBonte

In United States v. LaBonte, 117 S.Ct. 1673 (1997), the Court affirmed that prosecutors have the discretion to decide which charges to bring based on the available evidence. The decision emphasized that as long as the prosecution operates within the boundaries of the law and does not engage in unconstitutional practices, their discretion is largely unfettered. This case reinforces the broad latitude given to prosecutors in charge decisions.

The Role of Prosecutorial Guidelines

To ensure consistency and fairness, many jurisdictions have established prosecutorial guidelines. These guidelines provide a framework for decision-making, outlining factors to consider and procedures to follow. However, they also allow for flexibility to account for unique circumstances in each case.

Challenges and Considerations

Despite its importance, prosecutorial discretion is not without controversy. Critics argue that it can lead to inconsistencies, potential bias, and a lack of accountability. The discretionary nature of the role means that similar cases can result in vastly different outcomes depending on the prosecutors perspective and the jurisdiction.

Efforts to address these concerns include increased transparency, better oversight, and clearer guidelines to ensure decisions are made fairly and equitably. Additionally, some advocate for more robust review mechanisms to challenge potential abuses of discretion.

My Final Thoughts

Prosecutorial discretion is a fundamental component of the criminal justice system, allowing for nuanced and context-sensitive decision-making. While it carries the potential for both positive and negative outcomes, understanding the factors that influence these decisions and the legal precedents that shape them is crucial for navigating and appreciating the complexities of the criminal justice system.

By examining the cases identified above, we gain insight into how prosecutorial discretion operates within the legal framework. As the system continues to evolve, the challenge remains to balance discretion with fairness, ensuring justice is served in each unique case.

If you, or someone you know, will be engaging in self-representation in a criminal matter or is pursuing any form of post-conviction relief following a criminal conviction, our book, The Colossal Book of Criminal Citations, is a crucial tool in the pursuit of justice. Order your copy today, or on behalf of someone incarcerated. Our books are softcover, institution friendly, and ready for immediate shipping.