Prosecutorial misconduct is a significant issue within the criminal justice system that can have devastating consequences for defendants. This blog post aims to provide a comprehensive overview of prosecutorial misconduct, including its definition, prevalence, examples, and legal remedies available to defendants. Whether you’re a legal professional or someone interested in understanding this critical issue, this post will shed light on the topic.

Prosecutorial Misconduct Definition

Prosecutorial misconduct refers to unethical or illegal actions taken by a prosecutor during a criminal trial. These actions can undermine the fairness of the trial process and violate a defendant’s constitutional rights. Common forms include:

  1. Withholding Evidence: Prosecutors are required to disclose all exculpatory evidence to the defense. Failure to do so is a breach of the defendants right to a fair trial.
  2. Suborning Perjury: When a prosecutor encourages witnesses to lie or testify falsely, it can lead to wrongful convictions.
  3. Improper Closing Arguments: Making prejudicial or inflammatory statements during closing arguments can unfairly influence the jury.

Prevalence of Prosecutorial Misconduct

Determining the exact prevalence of prosecutorial misconduct is challenging because many cases go unreported or undetected. However, various studies and high-profile cases have shed light on the issue:

A 2013 National Registry of Exonerations study found that prosecutorial misconduct played a role in 42% of wrongful convictions.

High profile cases, like the Central Park Five and Michael Morton, discussed below, illustrate how prosecutorial misconduct can lead to innocent individuals being imprisoned for years.

how to address prosecutorial misconduct
Photo by pranav digwal on Pexels.com

Examples of Prosecutorial Misconduct

  1. Central Park Five Case: In this notorious case, five teenagers were wrongfully convicted of a brutal assault and rape in Central Park in 1989. The prosecutor, Linda Fairstein, was accused of withholding evidence and coercing confessions, leading to their wrongful convictions.
  2. Michael Morton Case: Michael Morton spent nearly 25 years in prison for a crime he didn’t commit. The prosecutor in his case withheld crucial evidence, including DNA evidence that could have cleared him.
  3. Ted Stevens Case: U.S. Senator Ted Stevens was convicted of corruption charges, but the case was later thrown out due to prosecutorial misconduct. The prosecutors had concealed exculpatory evidence.

Legal Remedies

Defendants who believe they have been victims of prosecutorial misconduct have legal remedies available to them:

  1. Direct Appeal: A defendant can raise the issue of prosecutorial misconduct on direct appeal. If misconduct is found, the conviction may be overturned, and a new trial granted.
  2. Habeas Corpus Petition: If the direct appeal fails, a defendant can file a habeas corpus petition, arguing that their constitutional rights were violated.
  3. Bar Complaint: Misconduct can also be reported to the state bar association, potentially leading to disciplinary action against the prosecutor.

Case Law References Regarding Prosecutorial Misconduct

Defendants can reference various case laws when raising claims of prosecutorial misconduct, including:

  1. Brady v. Maryland, 83 S.Ct. 1194 (1963): This landmark case established that prosecutors must disclose all material evidence favorable to the defendant
  2. Giglio v. United States. 92 S.Ct. 763 (1972): In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that the prosecution’s failure to correct false testimony can also constitute misconduct.
  3. United States v. Bagley, 105 S.Ct. 3375 (1985): In this case, the Supreme Court expanded the rule defined in Brady v. Maryland to include impeachment evidence, not just exculpatory evidence.

My Final Thoughts

Prosecutorial misconduct is a critical issue within the criminal justice system that can have far-reaching consequences. It undermines the principles of fairness and justice upon which the legal system is built. By understanding what it is, how often it occurs, and the legal remedies available, defendants can protect their rights and seek justice when prosecutorial misconduct occurs.

If you, or someone you know, will be seeking post-conviction relief to address claims related to prosecutorial misconduct, our book, The Colossal Book of Criminal Citations, is a crucial tool to have when pursuing justice. Our books are in stock and ready for immediate shipping. Order your copy today, or on behalf of someone incarcerated. Our books are softcover and institution friendly.